Vijaybhai Hareshbhai Dhalvaniya vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - PP — 119/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJBT010022442025

Filing Number

119/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Registration No

119/2025

Registration Date

24-Dec-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT, BOTAD

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374
Indian Penal Code Section 323,325

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vijaybhai Hareshbhai Dhalvaniya

    Adv. A S METALIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Gujarat Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CRA 119/2025 The Sessions Court at Botad allowed the criminal appeal by 22-year-old Vijaybhai Hareshbhai Dhalvaniya, confirming his conviction for voluntarily causing hurt (IPC §323) and causing grievous hurt (IPC §325) but granting him probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958. The court upheld the conviction while directing the appellant to execute a ₹20,000 bond with surety for one year, maintain good behavior, and pay ₹1,000 costs to the Legal Service Authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District Judge

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    For R&P

    Principal District Judge

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 119/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRA 119/2025 The Sessions Court at Botad allowed the criminal appeal by 22-year-old Vijaybhai Hareshbhai Dhalvaniya, confirming his conviction for voluntarily causing hurt (IPC §323) and causing grievous hurt (IPC §325) but granting him probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958. The court upheld the conviction while directing the appellant to execute a ₹20,000 bond with surety for one year, maintain good behavior, and pay ₹1,000 costs to the Legal Service Authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case