Shantuben Aebhalbhai Khachar vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - PP — 61/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJBT010012812025

Filing Number

61/2025

Filing Date

02-Aug-2025

Registration No

61/2025

Registration Date

02-Aug-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT, BOTAD

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11190004201258

Police Station

GADHADA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3)
Indian Penal Code Section 325,324,323,143,147,148,506(2),149

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shantuben Aebhalbhai Khachar

    Adv. R D GIDA

  2. 2.Rajendrabhai Bhabhlubhai Khachar

    Adv. R D GIDA

  3. 3.Mahendrabhai Bhabhlubhai Khachar

    Adv. R D GIDA

  4. 4.Mangalubhai Shantubhai Khachar

    Adv. R D GIDA

  5. 5.Pradipbhai Alias Katubhai Ravubhai Khachar

    Adv. R D GIDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Gujarat Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 61/2025 Court Decision: The Sessions Court at Botad confirmed the conviction of five appellants for offences under IPC Sections 325, 324, 323, 143, 147, 148, and 506(2), but granted them probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 instead of imprisonment. The appellants must execute bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with sureties for one year and pay Rs. 1,000 to the legal services authority. Key Reasoning: The court found the accused guilty of violent assault on the complainant using sticks and threatening him with a firearm following a prior dispute, but considered probation appropriate given the five-year lapse since the 2020 incident and the appellants' clean record during bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District Judge

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    For Arguement of appealant

    Principal District Judge

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    For Arguement of appealant

    Principal District Judge

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    For R&P

    Principal District Judge

  8. 12-Nov-2025

    For R&P

    Principal District Judge

  9. 12-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 02-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 61/2025 Court Decision: The Sessions Court at Botad confirmed the conviction of five appellants for offences under IPC Sections 325, 324, 323, 143, 147, 148, and 506(2), but granted them probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 instead of imprisonment. The appellants must execute bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with sureties for one year and pay Rs. 1,000 to the legal services authority. Key Reasoning: The court found the accused guilty of violent assault on the complainant using sticks and threatening him with a firearm following a prior dispute, but considered probation appropriate given the five-year lapse since the 2020 incident and the appellants' clean record during bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case