Keshavbhai Parshotambhai Gadhiya vs Vikaskumar Rajkumar Sachdev (Driver) Advocate - P V BAVALIYA — 34/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJBT010011482023
Filing Number
34/2023
Filing Date
18-Aug-2023
Registration No
34/2023
Registration Date
18-Aug-2023
Court
DISTRICT COURT, BOTAD
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Keshavbhai Parshotambhai Gadhiya
Adv. K D SHEKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vikaskumar Rajkumar Sachdev (Driver) Advocate - P V BAVALIYA
-
2.Himanshu Rajendra Khatvani (Owner)
Adv. P V BAVALIYA
-
3.Liberty General Insurance Ltd.
Adv. N H JHALA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The tribunal awarded compensation to two claimants injured in a January 2021 motorcycle-car collision caused by the car driver's negligent, rash driving at excessive speed. Despite the driver lacking a valid license (a policy breach), the tribunal held the insurance company liable to pay first, with recovery rights against the driver and vehicle owner. Claimant 1 received ₹4,10,769 and Claimant 2 received ₹1,44,601, plus 8% annual interest from the claim date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
For Argument of opponent
Principal District Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
02-Jan-2026
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
28-Nov-2025
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
Opponents Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
08-Aug-2025
For Other evidence of Applicant
Principal District Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
For Other evidence of Applicant
Principal District Judge
-
04-Jul-2025
For Other evidence of Applicant
Principal District Judge
-
02-May-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2025
Written Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Feb-2025
Written Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
07-Feb-2025
Written Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
13-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
22-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
27-Sep-2024
Written Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
19-Jul-2024
Written Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
31-May-2024
Written Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
05-Apr-2024
Written Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2024
Written Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2024
Written Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
15-Dec-2023
Written Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
09-Dec-2023
Written Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
27-Oct-2023
Written Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
22-Sep-2023
Written Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
09-Sep-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
18-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 34/2023
Summary The tribunal awarded compensation to two claimants injured in a January 2021 motorcycle-car collision caused by the car driver's negligent, rash driving at excessive speed. Despite the driver lacking a valid license (a policy breach), the tribunal held the insurance company liable to pay first, with recovery rights against the driver and vehicle owner. Claimant 1 received ₹4,10,769 and Claimant 2 received ₹1,44,601, plus 8% annual interest from the claim date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts