The State of Gujarat vs Hareshbhai Velshibhai Gabu Advocate - Y P PATHAK — 46/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,376(A),452,450. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 08th June 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJBT010011192023
Filing Number
46/2023
Filing Date
10-Aug-2023
Registration No
46/2023
Registration Date
10-Aug-2023
Court
DISTRICT COURT, BOTAD
Judge
2-Addl.district & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
08-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190005230248
Police Station
PALIYAD POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Gujarat
Adv. DGP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Hareshbhai Velshibhai Gabu Advocate - Y P PATHAK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jun-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 46/2023 - State of Gujarat vs. Hareshbhai Velshibhai Gabu Advocate Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted the accused, Hareshbhai Velshibhai Gabu, of all charges under IPC Sections 302 (murder), 376(A) (rape), 452, and 450. The court granted the benefit of doubt to the accused under Criminal Procedure Code Section 235(1). Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. While forensic evidence (DNA matching) suggested biological connection between the accused and the victim, the court found critical gaps in corroborating evidence. The victim's post-mortem report indicated death by manual strangulation, but no finger marks were found on the victim's neck. The accused bore no apparent injuries despite allegations of forcible rape. Multiple eyewitness accounts were internally contradictory and unreliable. Crucial medical samples were not properly preserved during the five-day gap between collection and forensic examination, raising chain-of-custody concerns. The prosecution could not convincingly establish the accused's intent, motive, or presence at the crime scene at the time of offense. Verdict: Accused acquitted and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
Disposed
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
25-May-2026
Final Arguments
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
11-May-2026
Final Arguments
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
24-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
10-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
31-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
03-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
22-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
27-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
03-Oct-2025
Further Statement
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
Further Statement
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
04-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
21-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
07-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
23-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
26-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
31-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
17-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
03-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
20-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
06-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
21-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
08-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
25-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
11-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
27-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
30-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
17-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
03-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
23-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
11-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
28-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
15-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
31-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
18-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
06-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
22-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
26-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
29-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
15-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
01-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
18-Dec-2023
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
05-Dec-2023
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
21-Nov-2023
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
07-Nov-2023
Witness List
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
30-Oct-2023
Witness List
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
17-Oct-2023
Witness List
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
09-Oct-2023
Witness List
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
25-Sep-2023
Documentary Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
11-Sep-2023
Documentary Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Aug-2023
Documentary Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
14-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 46/2023
Summary of Case 46/2023 - State of Gujarat vs. Hareshbhai Velshibhai Gabu Advocate Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted the accused, Hareshbhai Velshibhai Gabu, of all charges under IPC Sections 302 (murder), 376(A) (rape), 452, and 450. The court granted the benefit of doubt to the accused under Criminal Procedure Code Section 235(1). Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. While forensic evidence (DNA matching) suggested biological connection between the accused and the victim, the court found critical gaps in corroborating evidence. The victim's post-mortem report indicated death by manual strangulation, but no finger marks were found on the victim's neck. The accused bore no apparent injuries despite allegations of forcible rape. Multiple eyewitness accounts were internally contradictory and unreliable. Crucial medical samples were not properly preserved during the five-day gap between collection and forensic examination, raising chain-of-custody concerns. The prosecution could not convincingly establish the accused's intent, motive, or presence at the crime scene at the time of offense. Verdict: Accused acquitted and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts