Dharmdipbhai Kathubhai Khachar vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - A D ZALA — 184/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBT010005412026
Filing Number
184/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
184/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, BOTAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190005250400
Police Station
PALIYAD POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dharmdipbhai Kathubhai Khachar
Adv. A S METALIYA
Respondent(s)
The State of Gujarat Advocate - A D ZALA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY: CRMA 184/2026 The Sessions Court at Botad granted regular bail to 21-year-old Dharmdeepbhai Kathubhai Khachar, accused of Gujarat Prohibition Act violations involving contraband liquor worth Rs.74,68,400/-. The court found that the accused was not present at the offense location, nothing was recovered from his possession, and the offense place wasn't registered in his name. Critically, applying the "parity principle," the court noted the accused's role was no graver than a co-accused released on bail in a similar case (CRMA 12/2026), with no striking dissimilarities justifying different treatment. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs.20,000/- with one surety and standard conditions prohibiting absconding, witness tampering, and leaving Gujarat without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: CRMA 184/2026 The Sessions Court at Botad granted regular bail to 21-year-old Dharmdeepbhai Kathubhai Khachar, accused of Gujarat Prohibition Act violations involving contraband liquor worth Rs.74,68,400/-. The court found that the accused was not present at the offense location, nothing was recovered from his possession, and the offense place wasn't registered in his name. Critically, applying the "parity principle," the court noted the accused's role was no graver than a co-accused released on bail in a similar case (CRMA 12/2026), with no striking dissimilarities justifying different treatment. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs.20,000/- with one surety and standard conditions prohibiting absconding, witness tampering, and leaving Gujarat without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts