Arjanbhai Khodabhai Vadchhak vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - PP — 180/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBT010005332026

Filing Number

180/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

180/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, BOTAD

Judge

2-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11190005250420

Police Station

PALIYAD POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 65(1),64(2)(I),64(2)(M),351(2),351(3)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 3(A),4(2),5(J)(2),5(L),6,7,8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arjanbhai Khodabhai Vadchhak

    Adv. R B KHACHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Gujarat Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMA/180/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the regular bail application of 76-year-old Arjanbhai Khodabhai Vadchhak, accused of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl under POCSO Act provisions. The court found prima facie evidence of rape, repeated sexual assault, threats, and resulting pregnancy, emphasizing the gravity of charges and societal interest outweighs personal liberty at this crucial trial juncture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 180/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA/180/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the regular bail application of 76-year-old Arjanbhai Khodabhai Vadchhak, accused of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl under POCSO Act provisions. The court found prima facie evidence of rape, repeated sexual assault, threats, and resulting pregnancy, emphasizing the gravity of charges and societal interest outweighs personal liberty at this crucial trial juncture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case