Rathod Bachubhai Bhagvanbhai vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - PP — 179/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBT010005312026
Filing Number
179/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
179/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, BOTAD
Judge
2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190002251523
Police Station
BOTAD TOWN POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rathod Bachubhai Bhagvanbhai
Adv. M A YADAV
Respondent(s)
The State of Gujarat Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA/179/2026 The court allowed the applicant Rathod Bachubhai Bhagvanbhai's petition for interim custody of a seized Bajaj auto-rickshaw (Registration No. GJ-38-WA-3706), finding him to be the registered owner who did not participate in the offense. The court reasoned that the vehicle's prolonged storage in police custody causes deterioration and loss to national assets, and since the actual accused—not the owner—used it in the crime, custody could be granted with safeguards. The vehicle was released subject to conditions including a personal bond of 1.5 times the vehicle's value, prohibition on illegal use or transfer, and production on demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA/179/2026 The court allowed the applicant Rathod Bachubhai Bhagvanbhai's petition for interim custody of a seized Bajaj auto-rickshaw (Registration No. GJ-38-WA-3706), finding him to be the registered owner who did not participate in the offense. The court reasoned that the vehicle's prolonged storage in police custody causes deterioration and loss to national assets, and since the actual accused—not the owner—used it in the crime, custody could be granted with safeguards. The vehicle was released subject to conditions including a personal bond of 1.5 times the vehicle's value, prohibition on illegal use or transfer, and production on demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts