Vijaybhai Ravubhai Boricha vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - A D ZALA, SPP — 176/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBT010005272026
Filing Number
176/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
176/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, BOTAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190005260067
Police Station
PALIYAD POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vijaybhai Ravubhai Boricha
Adv. A H KURESHI
Respondent(s)
The State of Gujarat Advocate - A D ZALA, SPP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA 176/2026 The Sessions Court at Botad granted regular bail to Vijaybhai Ravubhai Boricha, accused of illegally procuring and transporting foreign liquor under the Prohibition Act and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found that while prima facie evidence existed, the investigation was at an early stage with no imminent trial, and detention would constitute pre-trial conviction contrary to constitutional protections. Bail was approved on a personal bond of ₹20,000 with surety, subject to conditions including non-absconding, cooperation with investigation, and restricted state travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA 176/2026 The Sessions Court at Botad granted regular bail to Vijaybhai Ravubhai Boricha, accused of illegally procuring and transporting foreign liquor under the Prohibition Act and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found that while prima facie evidence existed, the investigation was at an early stage with no imminent trial, and detention would constitute pre-trial conviction contrary to constitutional protections. Bail was approved on a personal bond of ₹20,000 with surety, subject to conditions including non-absconding, cooperation with investigation, and restricted state travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts