Rathod Nileshbhai Ramabhai vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - PP — 175/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBT010005262026
Filing Number
175/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
175/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, BOTAD
Judge
2-Addl.district & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190005250420
Police Station
PALIYAD POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rathod Nileshbhai Ramabhai
Adv. R M PARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Gujarat Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Rathod Nileshbhai Ramabhai v. State of Gujarat (CRMA/175/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge (POCSO Court), Botad, rejected the regular bail application of Rathod Nileshbhai Ramabhai (Accused No. 2), who is charged under POCSO Act and BNS sections for allegedly raping a 14-year-old girl, resulting in her pregnancy and childbirth. The court found a prima facie case against the accused based on the victim's statements and investigation record, and determined that the gravity of the allegations, the victim's tender age, and the early stage of trial outweighed considerations of personal liberty against society's interest in protecting child victims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 175/2026
Case Summary: Rathod Nileshbhai Ramabhai v. State of Gujarat (CRMA/175/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge (POCSO Court), Botad, rejected the regular bail application of Rathod Nileshbhai Ramabhai (Accused No. 2), who is charged under POCSO Act and BNS sections for allegedly raping a 14-year-old girl, resulting in her pregnancy and childbirth. The court found a prima facie case against the accused based on the victim's statements and investigation record, and determined that the gravity of the allegations, the victim's tender age, and the early stage of trial outweighed considerations of personal liberty against society's interest in protecting child victims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts