Rathod Nileshbhai Ramabhai vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - PP — 175/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBT010005262026
Filing Number
175/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
175/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, BOTAD
Judge
2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190005250420
Police Station
PALIYAD POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rathod Nileshbhai Ramabhai
Adv. R M PARMAR
Respondent(s)
The State of Gujarat Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Rathod Nileshbhai Ramabhai v. State of Gujarat (CRMA/175/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge (POCSO Court), Botad, rejected the regular bail application of Rathod Nileshbhai Ramabhai (Accused No. 2), who is charged under POCSO Act and BNS sections for allegedly raping a 14-year-old girl, resulting in her pregnancy and childbirth. The court found a prima facie case against the accused based on the victim's statements and investigation record, and determined that the gravity of the allegations, the victim's tender age, and the early stage of trial outweighed considerations of personal liberty against society's interest in protecting child victims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Rathod Nileshbhai Ramabhai v. State of Gujarat (CRMA/175/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge (POCSO Court), Botad, rejected the regular bail application of Rathod Nileshbhai Ramabhai (Accused No. 2), who is charged under POCSO Act and BNS sections for allegedly raping a 14-year-old girl, resulting in her pregnancy and childbirth. The court found a prima facie case against the accused based on the victim's statements and investigation record, and determined that the gravity of the allegations, the victim's tender age, and the early stage of trial outweighed considerations of personal liberty against society's interest in protecting child victims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts