Najkubhai Alias Ghughabhai Bavkubhai Dhadhal vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - PP — 158/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBT010003532026

Case disposed

Filing Number

158/2026

Filing Date

28-02-2026

Registration No

158/2026

Registration Date

28-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, BOTAD

Judge

2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11190001250459

Police Station

BARVALA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 117(2),118(1),115(2),351(3),54
SCHEDULED CASTS AND THE SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF TROCITIES) ACT, 1989 Section 3(1)(R)(S),3(2)(5-A)
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

Najkubhai Alias Ghughabhai Bavkubhai Dhadhal

Adv. A S METALIYA

Laljibhai Alias lalo Gabhabhai Limbadiya

Adv. A S METALIYA

Respondent(s)

The State of Gujarat Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

ORDER

05-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CRMA/158/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge, Botad rejected the regular bail application of two accused (Najkubhai and Laljibhai) charged with assault, criminal intimidation, and atrocity offences. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused inflicted injuries on the complainant and witnesses using an iron pipe, made caste-based threats, and cited the accused's prior criminal antecedents, ongoing trial with pending witness examination, and risk of evidence tampering as grounds for denial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA/158/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge, Botad rejected the regular bail application of two accused (Najkubhai and Laljibhai) charged with assault, criminal intimidation, and atrocity offences. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused inflicted injuries on the complainant and witnesses using an iron pipe, made caste-based threats, and cited the accused's prior criminal antecedents, ongoing trial with pending witness examination, and risk of evidence tampering as grounds for denial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT, BOTAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case