Shree Ram Transport Finance Co.LTD., Collection Manager Raviraj Bipinbhai Chauhan vs Vihabhai Rupabhai Saniya Advocate - B J Gohil — 18/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION

CNR: GJBT010003462026

Filing Number

18/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

18/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, BOTAD

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shree Ram Transport Finance Co.LTD., Collection Manager Raviraj Bipinbhai Chauhan

    Adv. K K SHEKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vihabhai Rupabhai Saniya Advocate - B J Gohil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Sessions Judge rejected the revision application filed by Shree Ram Transport Finance Company, finding it unmaintainable because the trial court's order rejecting document exhibits was merely interlocutory in nature and did not substantially affect parties' rights. However, the court allowed the applicant to later adduce oral evidence and then request the trial court to exhibit the documents (marks 67/1 to 67/3) during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 18/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge rejected the revision application filed by Shree Ram Transport Finance Company, finding it unmaintainable because the trial court's order rejecting document exhibits was merely interlocutory in nature and did not substantially affect parties' rights. However, the court allowed the applicant to later adduce oral evidence and then request the trial court to exhibit the documents (marks 67/1 to 67/3) during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case