Shree Ram Transport Finance Co.LTD., Collection Manager Hitendrasinh Chatursinh Sarvaiya vs Sanjaybhai Gobarbhai Rojara Advocate - R C PRAJAPATI — 16/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJBT010003442026
Filing Number
16/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
16/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, BOTAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shree Ram Transport Finance Co.LTD., Collection Manager Hitendrasinh Chatursinh Sarvaiya
Adv. K K SHEKH
Respondent(s)
Sanjaybhai Gobarbhai Rojara Advocate - R C PRAJAPATI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Shree Ram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. v. Sanjaybhai Gobrabhai Rojara (CR RA 16/2026) The Sessions Judge rejected Shree Ram Transport Finance's revision application challenging the trial court's order rejecting documents for exhibition. The court held the trial court's order was interlocutory in nature and hence non-revisable under CrPC Section 397(2), as exhibiting documents merely constitutes a procedural step that does not finally determine parties' rights or liabilities. However, the court allowed the applicant to adduce oral evidence through witnesses to subsequently exhibit the disputed documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Shree Ram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. v. Sanjaybhai Gobrabhai Rojara (CR RA 16/2026) The Sessions Judge rejected Shree Ram Transport Finance's revision application challenging the trial court's order rejecting documents for exhibition. The court held the trial court's order was interlocutory in nature and hence non-revisable under CrPC Section 397(2), as exhibiting documents merely constitutes a procedural step that does not finally determine parties' rights or liabilities. However, the court allowed the applicant to adduce oral evidence through witnesses to subsequently exhibit the disputed documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts