Shree Ram Transport Finance Co.LTD., Collection Manager Hitendrasinh Chatursinh Sarvaiya vs Sureshbhai Rajeshbhai Gamara Advocate - C R MEHTA — 15/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJBT010003432026
Filing Number
15/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
15/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, BOTAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shree Ram Transport Finance Co.LTD., Collection Manager Hitendrasinh Chatursinh Sarvaiya
Adv. K K SHEKH
Respondent(s)
Sureshbhai Rajeshbhai Gamara Advocate - C R MEHTA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CR R A 15/2026 Court Decision: The Sessions Judge at Botad rejected Shree Ram Transport Finance Company's revision application at the threshold, finding it unmaintainable. The trial court's order rejecting the company's application to exhibit three documents (marks 39/1 to 39/3) was deemed an interlocutory order, which cannot be challenged via revision under Section 397(2) CrPC. However, the applicant retains the right to adduce oral evidence and subsequently request document exhibition during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CR R A 15/2026 Court Decision: The Sessions Judge at Botad rejected Shree Ram Transport Finance Company's revision application at the threshold, finding it unmaintainable. The trial court's order rejecting the company's application to exhibit three documents (marks 39/1 to 39/3) was deemed an interlocutory order, which cannot be challenged via revision under Section 397(2) CrPC. However, the applicant retains the right to adduce oral evidence and subsequently request document exhibition during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts