Shree Ram Transport Finance Co.LTD., Collection Manager Hitendrasinh Chatursinh Sarvaiya vs Shivkubhai Hakubhai Khachar Advocate - D B SHEKHALIYA — 13/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJBT010003412026
Filing Number
13/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
13/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, BOTAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shree Ram Transport Finance Co.LTD., Collection Manager Hitendrasinh Chatursinh Sarvaiya
Adv. K K SHEKH
Respondent(s)
Shivkubhai Hakubhai Khachar Advocate - D B SHEKHALIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CR R A 13/2026 The Sessions Judge at Botad rejected Shree Ram Transport Finance Co.'s revision application challenging the trial court's order denying admission of four documents (marks 38/1-38/4) into evidence. The court held that the trial court's rejection order was an interlocutory order (provisional/interim in nature) and therefore not subject to revision under Section 397(2) of the CrPC, as it does not finally decide parties' rights. However, the applicant retains the right to introduce these documents through witness examination during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CR R A 13/2026 The Sessions Judge at Botad rejected Shree Ram Transport Finance Co.'s revision application challenging the trial court's order denying admission of four documents (marks 38/1-38/4) into evidence. The court held that the trial court's rejection order was an interlocutory order (provisional/interim in nature) and therefore not subject to revision under Section 397(2) of the CrPC, as it does not finally decide parties' rights. However, the applicant retains the right to introduce these documents through witness examination during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts