LATE.MUKESHBHAI DHANJIBHAI RATHOD vs NATUGIRI SHAMBHUGIRI GAUSWAMI Advocate - A J SANGHAVI — 10/2022

Case under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4(A). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

WC FATAL LC - W.C. Application Fatal

CNR: GJBN160002322022

Filing Number

10/2022

Filing Date

02-Aug-2022

Registration No

10/2022

Registration Date

02-Aug-2022

Court

LABOUR COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

2-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Employees Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LATE.MUKESHBHAI DHANJIBHAI RATHOD

    Adv. C D BHALANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NATUGIRI SHAMBHUGIRI GAUSWAMI Advocate - A J SANGHAVI

  2. 2.H.D.F.C.IRGO GENRAL INSURANCE COMPANY

    Adv. N H JHALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition filed by Mukeshbhai Dhanjibhai Rathod. The petitioner had sought a review of an earlier order (Order-22) through a review petition under CPC Order-22, but the court found the review petition to lack merit and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 26-Nov-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 24-Sep-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 30-Jul-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 04-Jun-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 09-Apr-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 19-Feb-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 16-Jan-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 04-Dec-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 09-Oct-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 21-Aug-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 03-Jul-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 01-May-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 13-Mar-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 24-Jan-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  21. 13-Dec-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  22. 11-Oct-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  23. 23-Aug-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  24. 05-Jul-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  25. 17-May-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  26. 29-Mar-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  27. 08-Feb-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  28. 28-Dec-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  29. 09-Nov-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  30. 14-Sep-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  31. 10-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 02-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition filed by Mukeshbhai Dhanjibhai Rathod. The petitioner had sought a review of an earlier order (Order-22) through a review petition under CPC Order-22, but the court found the review petition to lack merit and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case