LATE.MUKESHBHAI DHANJIBHAI RATHOD vs NATUGIRI SHAMBHUGIRI GAUSWAMI Advocate - A J SANGHAVI — 10/2022
Case under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4(A). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
WC FATAL LC - W.C. Application Fatal
CNR: GJBN160002322022
Filing Number
10/2022
Filing Date
02-08-2022
Registration No
10/2022
Registration Date
02-08-2022
Court
LABOUR COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LATE.MUKESHBHAI DHANJIBHAI RATHOD
Adv. C D BHALANI
Respondent(s)
NATUGIRI SHAMBHUGIRI GAUSWAMI Advocate - A J SANGHAVI
H.D.F.C.IRGO GENRAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Adv. N H JHALA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Disposed
For Reply of opponent
For Reply of opponent
For Reply of opponent
For Reply of opponent
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | For Reply of opponent |
| 11-03-2026 | For Reply of opponent |
| 28-01-2026 | For Reply of opponent |
| 26-11-2025 | For Reply of opponent |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the petition filed by Mukeshbhai Dhanjibhai Rathod. The petitioner had sought a review of an earlier order (Order-22) through a review petition under CPC Order-22, but the court found the review petition to lack merit and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the petition filed by Mukeshbhai Dhanjibhai Rathod. The petitioner had sought a review of an earlier order (Order-22) through a review petition under CPC Order-22, but the court found the review petition to lack merit and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts