FACTORY INSPECTOR vs SHRI SANDIPBHAI NANJIBHAI GHEVARIYA Advocate - N H JADEJA — 37/2026
Case under Factories Act, 1948 Section 68. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN160001092026
Filing Number
37/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
37/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
LABOUR COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FACTORY INSPECTOR
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRI SANDIPBHAI NANJIBHAI GHEVARIYA Advocate - N H JADEJA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 37/2026 Decision: The court found Shri Sandipbhai Nanjibhai Ghevariya, the factory owner/manager, guilty of violating Section 68 of the Factories Act, 1948, for employing a worker under 18 years without obtaining a required fitness certificate from a certified surgeon. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹5,000 and 30 days simple imprisonment in default of payment. Key Reasoning: The respondent failed to obtain mandatory medical fitness documentation before employing the minor worker and did not provide the required certificate to the worker, constituting a clear breach of statutory obligations under the Factories Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 37/2026
Case Summary: 37/2026 Decision: The court found Shri Sandipbhai Nanjibhai Ghevariya, the factory owner/manager, guilty of violating Section 68 of the Factories Act, 1948, for employing a worker under 18 years without obtaining a required fitness certificate from a certified surgeon. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹5,000 and 30 days simple imprisonment in default of payment. Key Reasoning: The respondent failed to obtain mandatory medical fitness documentation before employing the minor worker and did not provide the required certificate to the worker, constituting a clear breach of statutory obligations under the Factories Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts