RAJIBEN ANANDBHAI GOHIL vs VARDHMAN JAIN AGAM MANDIR Advocate - K M GANDHI — 39/2011

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 010. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJBN160000322011

Filing Number

39/2011

Filing Date

07-May-2011

Registration No

39/2011

Registration Date

07-May-2011

Court

LABOUR COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 010

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJIBEN ANANDBHAI GOHIL

    Adv. R P NARIGARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VARDHMAN JAIN AGAM MANDIR Advocate - K M GANDHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 39/2011 Court Decision: The Labour Court at Bhavnagar dismissed the worker's industrial dispute reference. The court held that Vardhman Jain Agam Mandir, being a religious trust institution, does not qualify as an "industry" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and therefore the Act's protections do not apply to the worker. Key Reasoning: Applying the triple test established in precedent law, the court found insufficient evidence that the temple trust engaged in systematic economic activities, maintained an employer-employee relationship, or produced goods/services primarily for commercial profit. The institution's activities were deemed charitable and religious in nature rather than industrial, making the worker ineligible for statutory protections against termination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    For Arguement of Opponant

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 24-Dec-2025

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 06-Nov-2025

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 11-Sep-2025

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 08-Aug-2025

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 27-Jun-2025

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 14-May-2025

    For Argument of Applicant

    Vacant Court

  15. 15-Apr-2025

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 19-Mar-2025

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 12-Feb-2025

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 27-Jan-2025

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 23-Dec-2024

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 22-Nov-2024

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 23-Oct-2024

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  22. 08-Oct-2024

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 12-Sep-2024

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  24. 01-Aug-2024

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  25. 05-Jul-2024

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  26. 07-Jun-2024

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  27. 12-Apr-2024

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  28. 21-Feb-2024

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  29. 22-Jan-2024

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  30. 18-Dec-2023

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  31. 24-Nov-2023

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  32. 20-Oct-2023

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  33. 13-Sep-2023

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  34. 09-Aug-2023

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  35. 08-Jul-2023

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  36. 13-Jun-2023

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  37. 24-May-2023

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  38. 12-Apr-2023

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  39. 09-Mar-2023

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  40. 25-Jan-2023

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  41. 22-Dec-2022

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  42. 10-Nov-2022

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  43. 15-Sep-2022

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  44. 10-Aug-2022

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  45. 11-Jul-2022

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  46. 09-May-2022

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  47. 12-Mar-2022

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  48. 24-Feb-2022

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  49. 10-Feb-2022

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  50. 03-Jan-2022

    For Other evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  51. 14-Dec-2021

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court

  52. 01-Dec-2021

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court

  53. 22-Oct-2021

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  54. 17-Sep-2021

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  55. 16-Jul-2021

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  56. 21-May-2021

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  57. 01-Apr-2021

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  58. 04-Feb-2021

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  59. 22-Jan-2021

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  60. 27-Nov-2020

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  61. 09-Oct-2020

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  62. 24-Jul-2020

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  63. 10-Jun-2020

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  64. 22-Apr-2020

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  65. 13-Mar-2020

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  66. 30-Jan-2020

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  67. 18-Dec-2019

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  68. 29-Nov-2019

    For Argument of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  69. 09-Oct-2019

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  70. 11-Sep-2019

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  71. 10-Sep-2019

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  72. 03-Sep-2019

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  73. 12-Jul-2019

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  74. 18-Jun-2019

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  75. 25-Apr-2019

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  76. 01-Mar-2019

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  77. 12-Feb-2019

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  78. 22-Jan-2019

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  79. 08-Dec-2018

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  80. 23-Oct-2018

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  81. 04-Sep-2018

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  82. 03-Aug-2018

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  83. 02-Jul-2018

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  84. 04-Jun-2018

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  85. 15-May-2018

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  86. 23-Apr-2018

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  87. 28-Mar-2018

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  88. 03-Mar-2018

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  89. 06-Feb-2018

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  90. 19-Dec-2017

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  91. 07-Nov-2017

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  92. 12-Sep-2017

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  93. 04-Aug-2017

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  94. 30-Jun-2017

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  95. 14-Jun-2017

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  96. 31-May-2017

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  97. 29-Apr-2017

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  98. 18-Mar-2017

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  99. 07-Mar-2017

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  100. 15-Feb-2017

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  101. 31-Jan-2017

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  102. 18-Jan-2017

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  103. 02-Jan-2017

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  104. 06-Dec-2016

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  105. 25-Oct-2016

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  106. 01-Oct-2016

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  107. 21-Sep-2016

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  108. 19-Sep-2016

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  109. 16-May-2016

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  110. 07-Apr-2016

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  111. 25-Feb-2016

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  112. 28-Jan-2016

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  113. 26-Nov-2015

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  114. 19-Oct-2015

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  115. 05-Oct-2015

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  116. 14-Sep-2015

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  117. 03-Aug-2015

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  118. 01-Jun-2015

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  119. 05-May-2015

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  120. 24-Apr-2015

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  121. 20-Mar-2015

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  122. 06-Feb-2015

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  123. 28-Jan-2015

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  124. 26-Nov-2014

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  125. 01-Oct-2014

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  126. 05-Sep-2014

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  127. 20-Aug-2014

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  128. 30-Jul-2014

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  129. 10-Jul-2014

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  130. 15-May-2014

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  131. 03-Apr-2014

    For Evidence of Applicant

  132. 06-Mar-2014

    For Evidence of Applicant

  133. 30-Jan-2014

    For Evidence of Applicant

  134. 03-Jan-2014

    For Evidence of Applicant

  135. 06-Dec-2013

    For Evidence of Applicant

  136. 24-Oct-2013

    For Evidence of Applicant

  137. 26-Sep-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  138. 07-May-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. 39/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 39/2011 Court Decision: The Labour Court at Bhavnagar dismissed the worker's industrial dispute reference. The court held that Vardhman Jain Agam Mandir, being a religious trust institution, does not qualify as an "industry" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and therefore the Act's protections do not apply to the worker. Key Reasoning: Applying the triple test established in precedent law, the court found insufficient evidence that the temple trust engaged in systematic economic activities, maintained an employer-employee relationship, or produced goods/services primarily for commercial profit. The institution's activities were deemed charitable and religious in nature rather than industrial, making the worker ineligible for statutory protections against termination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case