RAMUBEN KALUBHAI MAKWANA vs VARDHMAN JAIN AGAM MANDIR Advocate - K M GANDHI — 38/2011
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 010. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 28th April 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJBN160000312011
Filing Number
38/2011
Filing Date
07-May-2011
Registration No
38/2011
Registration Date
07-May-2011
Court
LABOUR COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMUBEN KALUBHAI MAKWANA
Adv. R P NARIGARA
Respondent(s)
-
1.VARDHMAN JAIN AGAM MANDIR Advocate - K M GANDHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 38/2011 Case Details Court: Labour Court, Bhavnagar Petitioner: Ramuben Kalubhai Makwana Respondent: Vardhman Jain Agam Mandir (Religious Trust) Decision The Labour Court rejected the petitioner's claim for reinstatement with back wages. The court found that while the petitioner worked as a cleaning staff member at the temple trust since 1990, the trust failed to establish itself as an "industry" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Applying the "Triple Test" from precedent case law, the court determined the trust was primarily a charitable/religious organization without sufficient commercial character to be classified as an industrial establishment, thereby placing it outside the Act's jurisdiction. Consequently, the petitioner could not claim statutory protections for unfair termination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Apr-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Feb-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Feb-2026
For Arguement of Opponant
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Feb-2026
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Dec-2025
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Nov-2025
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Sep-2025
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Aug-2025
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Jun-2025
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
14-May-2025
For Argument of Applicant
Vacant Court
-
15-Apr-2025
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Mar-2025
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Feb-2025
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Jan-2025
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Dec-2024
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Nov-2024
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Oct-2024
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Oct-2024
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Sep-2024
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Aug-2024
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Jul-2024
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Jun-2024
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Apr-2024
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Feb-2024
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Jan-2024
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Dec-2023
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Nov-2023
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Oct-2023
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Sep-2023
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Aug-2023
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Jul-2023
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Jun-2023
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-May-2023
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Apr-2023
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Mar-2023
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Jan-2023
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Dec-2022
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Nov-2022
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Sep-2022
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Aug-2022
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Jul-2022
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-May-2022
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Mar-2022
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Feb-2022
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Feb-2022
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Jan-2022
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
14-Dec-2021
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Dec-2021
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Oct-2021
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Sep-2021
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Jul-2021
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-May-2021
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Apr-2021
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Feb-2021
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Jan-2021
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Nov-2020
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Oct-2020
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Jul-2020
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Jun-2020
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Apr-2020
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Mar-2020
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
30-Jan-2020
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Dec-2019
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
29-Nov-2019
For Argument of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Oct-2019
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
30-Aug-2019
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Jul-2019
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Jun-2019
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Apr-2019
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Mar-2019
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Feb-2019
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Jan-2019
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Dec-2018
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Oct-2018
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Sep-2018
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Aug-2018
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
02-Jul-2018
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Jun-2018
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-May-2018
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Apr-2018
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Mar-2018
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Mar-2018
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Feb-2018
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Dec-2017
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Nov-2017
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Sep-2017
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Aug-2017
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
30-Jun-2017
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
14-Jun-2017
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-May-2017
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
29-Apr-2017
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Mar-2017
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Mar-2017
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Feb-2017
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Jan-2017
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Jan-2017
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
02-Jan-2017
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Dec-2016
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Oct-2016
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Oct-2016
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Sep-2016
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Sep-2016
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-May-2016
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Apr-2016
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Feb-2016
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Jan-2016
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Nov-2015
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Oct-2015
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Oct-2015
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
14-Sep-2015
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Aug-2015
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Jun-2015
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-May-2015
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Apr-2015
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Mar-2015
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Feb-2015
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Jan-2015
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Nov-2014
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Oct-2014
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Sep-2014
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Aug-2014
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
30-Jul-2014
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Jul-2014
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-May-2014
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Apr-2014
For Evidence of Applicant
-
06-Mar-2014
For Evidence of Applicant
-
30-Jan-2014
For Evidence of Applicant
-
03-Jan-2014
For Evidence of Applicant
-
06-Dec-2013
For Reply of opponent
-
24-Oct-2013
For Reply of opponent
-
26-Sep-2013
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-May-2011
Case filed
Registration No. 38/2011
Summary of Case 38/2011 Case Details Court: Labour Court, Bhavnagar Petitioner: Ramuben Kalubhai Makwana Respondent: Vardhman Jain Agam Mandir (Religious Trust) Decision The Labour Court rejected the petitioner's claim for reinstatement with back wages. The court found that while the petitioner worked as a cleaning staff member at the temple trust since 1990, the trust failed to establish itself as an "industry" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Applying the "Triple Test" from precedent case law, the court determined the trust was primarily a charitable/religious organization without sufficient commercial character to be classified as an industrial establishment, thereby placing it outside the Act's jurisdiction. Consequently, the petitioner could not claim statutory protections for unfair termination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts