RAMUBEN KALUBHAI MAKWANA vs VARDHMAN JAIN AGAM MANDIR Advocate - K M GANDHI — 38/2011
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 010. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 28th April 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJBN160000312011
Filing Number
38/2011
Filing Date
07-05-2011
Registration No
38/2011
Registration Date
07-05-2011
Court
LABOUR COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMUBEN KALUBHAI MAKWANA
Adv. R P NARIGARA
Respondent(s)
VARDHMAN JAIN AGAM MANDIR Advocate - K M GANDHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Disposed
For Order
For Order
For Order
For Arguement of Opponant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-04-2026 | For Order |
| 13-03-2026 | For Order |
| 28-02-2026 | For Order |
| 19-02-2026 | For Arguement of Opponant |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 38/2011 Case Details Court: Labour Court, Bhavnagar Petitioner: Ramuben Kalubhai Makwana Respondent: Vardhman Jain Agam Mandir (Religious Trust) Decision The Labour Court rejected the petitioner's claim for reinstatement with back wages. The court found that while the petitioner worked as a cleaning staff member at the temple trust since 1990, the trust failed to establish itself as an "industry" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Applying the "Triple Test" from precedent case law, the court determined the trust was primarily a charitable/religious organization without sufficient commercial character to be classified as an industrial establishment, thereby placing it outside the Act's jurisdiction. Consequently, the petitioner could not claim statutory protections for unfair termination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 38/2011 Case Details Court: Labour Court, Bhavnagar Petitioner: Ramuben Kalubhai Makwana Respondent: Vardhman Jain Agam Mandir (Religious Trust) Decision The Labour Court rejected the petitioner's claim for reinstatement with back wages. The court found that while the petitioner worked as a cleaning staff member at the temple trust since 1990, the trust failed to establish itself as an "industry" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Applying the "Triple Test" from precedent case law, the court determined the trust was primarily a charitable/religious organization without sufficient commercial character to be classified as an industrial establishment, thereby placing it outside the Act's jurisdiction. Consequently, the petitioner could not claim statutory protections for unfair termination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts