MAJBUTBHAI BHOJABHAI KHUMAN vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 7/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 30th May 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJBN150000912026
Filing Number
7/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
7/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
FTC COURT, MAHUVA
Judge
1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
30th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
364
Police Station
MAHUVA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAJBUTBHAI BHOJABHAI KHUMAN
Adv. M C BADHEKA
VANRAJBHAI BHOJABHAI KHUMAN
Adv. M C BADHEKA
RANJITBHAI BHOJABHAI KHUMAN
Adv. M C BADHEKA
NATHUBHAI BALUBHAI KAMLIYA
Adv. M C BADHEKA
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FOR R&P
FOR R&P
FOR R&P
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 30-04-2026 | FOR R&P |
| 20-04-2026 | FOR R&P |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR R&P |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Court in Mahuva rejected the accused's criminal revision petition challenging a charge framing order in case FIR 2175/2022. The court found that the accused (Majbutbhai and others) caused grievous injury to the victim with a iron pipe, with medical evidence confirming life-threatening head injuries including brain compression and skull fracture that required neurosurgery. The court upheld the trial court's decision to frame charges under IPC Sections 307 (attempt to murder) and 326 (causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons), holding that the prosecution established the necessary criminal intent and guilty knowledge based on the severity of injuries inflicted and medical testimony that the victim could have died without immediate treatment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Court in Mahuva rejected the accused's criminal revision petition challenging a charge framing order in case FIR 2175/2022. The court found that the accused (Majbutbhai and others) caused grievous injury to the victim with a iron pipe, with medical evidence confirming life-threatening head injuries including brain compression and skull fracture that required neurosurgery. The court upheld the trial court's decision to frame charges under IPC Sections 307 (attempt to murder) and 326 (causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons), holding that the prosecution established the necessary criminal intent and guilty knowledge based on the severity of injuries inflicted and medical testimony that the victim could have died without immediate treatment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts