MAJBUTBHAI BHOJABHAI KHUMAN vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 7/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 30th May 2026.

Case disposed

CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION

CNR: GJBN150000912026

Filing Number

7/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

7/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

FTC COURT, MAHUVA

Judge

1-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

30-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

364

Police Station

MAHUVA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438
Indian Penal Code Section 325,323,504(2),114
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAJBUTBHAI BHOJABHAI KHUMAN

    Adv. M C BADHEKA

  2. 2.VANRAJBHAI BHOJABHAI KHUMAN

    Adv. M C BADHEKA

  3. 3.RANJITBHAI BHOJABHAI KHUMAN

    Adv. M C BADHEKA

  4. 4.NATHUBHAI BALUBHAI KAMLIYA

    Adv. M C BADHEKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Court in Mahuva rejected the accused's criminal revision petition challenging a charge framing order in case FIR 2175/2022. The court found that the accused (Majbutbhai and others) caused grievous injury to the victim with a iron pipe, with medical evidence confirming life-threatening head injuries including brain compression and skull fracture that required neurosurgery. The court upheld the trial court's decision to frame charges under IPC Sections 307 (attempt to murder) and 326 (causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons), holding that the prosecution established the necessary criminal intent and guilty knowledge based on the severity of injuries inflicted and medical testimony that the victim could have died without immediate treatment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-May-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 08-May-2026

    Judgement

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    For R&P

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    For R&P

    2nd Addl District Judge

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    For R&P

    2nd Addl District Judge

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Court in Mahuva rejected the accused's criminal revision petition challenging a charge framing order in case FIR 2175/2022. The court found that the accused (Majbutbhai and others) caused grievous injury to the victim with a iron pipe, with medical evidence confirming life-threatening head injuries including brain compression and skull fracture that required neurosurgery. The court upheld the trial court's decision to frame charges under IPC Sections 307 (attempt to murder) and 326 (causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons), holding that the prosecution established the necessary criminal intent and guilty knowledge based on the severity of injuries inflicted and medical testimony that the victim could have died without immediate treatment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case