PALJIBHAI MAYABHAI PARMAR vs SADBHAVNA TRUST HOSPITAL VAHIVATKARTA SADBHAVNA TRUST HOSPITAL, Advocate - H N ANDHERIA — 1/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT

CNR: GJBN150000252026

Filing Number

1/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Court

FTC COURT, MAHUVA

Judge

1-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PALJIBHAI MAYABHAI PARMAR

    Adv. P L SONPAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SADBHAVNA TRUST HOSPITAL VAHIVATKARTA SADBHAVNA TRUST HOSPITAL, Advocate - H N ANDHERIA

  2. 2.MEDICAL OFFICER , SADBHAVNA TRUST HOSPITAL,

    Adv. H N ANDHERIA

  3. 3.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court allowed Paljibhai Mayabhai Parmar's pauper application to sue as an indigent person against Sadbhavna Trust Hospital and the State of Gujarat, exempting him from court fees. The court found that since the trial court had previously approved his indigent status and no evidence showed he had ceased being indigent, no further inquiry was necessary under CPC Order 44, Rule 3, upholding the principle that poverty should not bar access to justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Paljibhai Mayabhai Parmar's pauper application to sue as an indigent person against Sadbhavna Trust Hospital and the State of Gujarat, exempting him from court fees. The court found that since the trial court had previously approved his indigent status and no evidence showed he had ceased being indigent, no further inquiry was necessary under CPC Order 44, Rule 3, upholding the principle that poverty should not bar access to justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case