CHANDU SOMA MER AND OTHERS vs CHIEF EXICUTIVE OFFICER, G.M.T.B. Advocate - S C DESAI — 1/2013

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

COMP IT - COMPLAINT (I.T.)

CNR: GJBN140002512013

For Evidence of Applicant

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

1/2013

Filing Date

15-01-2013

Registration No

1/2013

Registration Date

15-01-2013

Court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33

Petitioner(s)

CHANDU SOMA MER AND OTHERS

Adv. A R CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

CHIEF EXICUTIVE OFFICER, G.M.T.B. Advocate - S C DESAI

PORT OFFICER, G.M.T.B.

Adv. S C DESAI

SAGAR STIVIDOS PVT LTD

Adv. P P PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT

12-05-2026

For Evidence of Applicant

02-05-2026

For Evidence of Applicant

18-04-2026

For Evidence of Applicant

10-04-2026

For Evidence of Applicant

13-03-2026

For Evidence of Applicant

Interim Orders

02-12-2013
Order Number 1

Case Summary: CHANDU SOMA MER AND OTHERS v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, G.M.T.B. (1/2013) The Industrial Tribunal at Bhavnagar dismissed the complaint filed by workers against GMTB and Sagar Stividos Pvt Ltd. The tribunal found that the petitioners failed to establish prima facie claims of wrongful termination or violation of labor laws, and that no employer-employee relationship existed between the parties as required. The court directed the case to be disposed with costs awarded against the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CHANDU SOMA MER AND OTHERS v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, G.M.T.B. (1/2013) The Industrial Tribunal at Bhavnagar dismissed the complaint filed by workers against GMTB and Sagar Stividos Pvt Ltd. The tribunal found that the petitioners failed to establish prima facie claims of wrongful termination or violation of labor laws, and that no employer-employee relationship existed between the parties as required. The court directed the case to be disposed with costs awarded against the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, BHAVNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case