CHANDU SOMA MER AND OTHERS vs CHIEF EXICUTIVE OFFICER, G.M.T.B. Advocate - S C DESAI — 1/2013
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
COMP IT - COMPLAINT (I.T.)
CNR: GJBN140002512013
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
1/2013
Filing Date
15-01-2013
Registration No
1/2013
Registration Date
15-01-2013
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHANDU SOMA MER AND OTHERS
Adv. A R CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
CHIEF EXICUTIVE OFFICER, G.M.T.B. Advocate - S C DESAI
PORT OFFICER, G.M.T.B.
Adv. S C DESAI
SAGAR STIVIDOS PVT LTD
Adv. P P PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 02-05-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 18-04-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 10-04-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
| 13-03-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CHANDU SOMA MER AND OTHERS v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, G.M.T.B. (1/2013) The Industrial Tribunal at Bhavnagar dismissed the complaint filed by workers against GMTB and Sagar Stividos Pvt Ltd. The tribunal found that the petitioners failed to establish prima facie claims of wrongful termination or violation of labor laws, and that no employer-employee relationship existed between the parties as required. The court directed the case to be disposed with costs awarded against the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CHANDU SOMA MER AND OTHERS v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, G.M.T.B. (1/2013) The Industrial Tribunal at Bhavnagar dismissed the complaint filed by workers against GMTB and Sagar Stividos Pvt Ltd. The tribunal found that the petitioners failed to establish prima facie claims of wrongful termination or violation of labor laws, and that no employer-employee relationship existed between the parties as required. The court directed the case to be disposed with costs awarded against the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts