THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ABUBHAI SULEMANBHAI NATHVANI Advocate - V V JADAV — 162/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN120002382026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

162/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

162/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALLABHIPUR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198065260060

Police Station

VALLABHIPUR POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.ABUBHAI SULEMANBHAI NATHVANI Advocate - V V JADAV

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Abubhai Sulemanbhai Nathvani (162/2026) The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act 2016, Section 66(1)(b), and sentenced him to community service at a government school in Vallabhpur under BNS Section 230. The court held that the accused's plea of innocence was unsubstantiated and emphasized that community service—involving tasks like street cleaning, social welfare projects, or environmental protection—serves as an appropriate alternative sentence for specified offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
13-Mar-2026

Plea

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
06-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
06-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 162/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Abubhai Sulemanbhai Nathvani (162/2026) The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act 2016, Section 66(1)(b), and sentenced him to community service at a government school in Vallabhpur under BNS Section 230. The court held that the accused's plea of innocence was unsubstantiated and emphasized that community service—involving tasks like street cleaning, social welfare projects, or environmental protection—serves as an appropriate alternative sentence for specified offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.