MAHEBUBBHAI ALARAKHBHAI MALEK vs JANM MARAN NONDHANI REGISTRAR SHREE AND TALATI MANTRI SHREE, LOLIYANA — 38/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 Section 13(3)B. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th May 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBN120002172026
Filing Number
38/2026
Filing Date
21-02-2026
Registration No
38/2026
Registration Date
21-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VALLABHIPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHEBUBBHAI ALARAKHBHAI MALEK
Adv. M H PATHAN
Respondent(s)
JANM MARAN NONDHANI REGISTRAR SHREE AND TALATI MANTRI SHREE, LOLIYANA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 20-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 28-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Mahebubbhai Alarakhbhai Malek v. Registrar, Births and Deaths (Case 38/2026) The court rejected the applicant's application for delayed birth registration under Section 13(3) of the Births and Deaths Registration Act, 1969. The 2023 amendment transferred jurisdiction for delayed registrations (beyond one year) from Judicial Magistrates to District Magistrates, Sub-Divisional Magistrates, or authorized Executive Magistrates, and the court found it lacked authority to entertain the application despite recording evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Mahebubbhai Alarakhbhai Malek v. Registrar, Births and Deaths (Case 38/2026) The court rejected the applicant's application for delayed birth registration under Section 13(3) of the Births and Deaths Registration Act, 1969. The 2023 amendment transferred jurisdiction for delayed registrations (beyond one year) from Judicial Magistrates to District Magistrates, Sub-Divisional Magistrates, or authorized Executive Magistrates, and the court found it lacked authority to entertain the application despite recording evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts