THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SANGITABEN BHUPATBHAI MATHASULIYA Advocate - B P PARMAR — 83/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN090001022026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2026
Filing Number
83/2026
Filing Date
21-Feb-2026
Registration No
83/2026
Registration Date
21-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, UMRALA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198059260035
Police Station
UMRALA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANGITABEN BHUPATBHAI MATHASULIYA Advocate - B P PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: C.C.NO. 83/2026 Court Decision: The accused, Sangitaben Bhupatbhai Mathasuliya, was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for alleged unauthorized possession and sale of alcohol. The court found insufficient evidence of exclusive conscious possession by the accused, as the panchnama (official search record) witnesses failed to corroborate key facts, and proper investigative procedures were not followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Apr-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 83/2026
Case Summary: C.C.NO. 83/2026 Court Decision: The accused, Sangitaben Bhupatbhai Mathasuliya, was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for alleged unauthorized possession and sale of alcohol. The court found insufficient evidence of exclusive conscious possession by the accused, as the panchnama (official search record) witnesses failed to corroborate key facts, and proper investigative procedures were not followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts