THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KIRANBEN KISHANBHAI MATHASULIYA Advocate - B P PARMAR — 81/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN090001002026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2026
Filing Number
81/2026
Filing Date
21-02-2026
Registration No
81/2026
Registration Date
21-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, UMRALA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198059260027
Police Station
UMRALA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KIRANBEN KISHANBHAI MATHASULIYA Advocate - B P PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 04-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 27-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 20-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C.NO. 81/2026 Court Decision: The Principal Judicial Magistrate First Class, Umrala, acquitted Kiranben Kishanbhai Mathasuliya of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for allegedly possessing and selling liquor without permission. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused had exclusive and conscious possession of the confiscated liquor, as the panchnama (seizure record) lacked proper corroboration from independent witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C.NO. 81/2026 Court Decision: The Principal Judicial Magistrate First Class, Umrala, acquitted Kiranben Kishanbhai Mathasuliya of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for allegedly possessing and selling liquor without permission. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused had exclusive and conscious possession of the confiscated liquor, as the panchnama (seizure record) lacked proper corroboration from independent witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts