THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAJUBHAI BAJUBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - B P PARMAR — 41/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN090000492026
e-Filing Number
19-01-2026
Filing Number
41/2026
Filing Date
19-01-2026
Registration No
41/2026
Registration Date
19-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, UMRALA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
13th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198059250548
Police Station
UMRALA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAJUBHAI BAJUBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - B P PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 05-05-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 18-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 10-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C.NO. 41/2026 Court Decision: The Principal J.M.F.C, Umrala acquitted defendant Rajubhai Bajubhai Vaghela of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) for alleged illicit liquor possession and sale, finding insufficient evidence of exclusive conscious possession to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite seizure of contraband material, prosecution witnesses (panchas/village elders) failed to corroborate critical details of the seizure panchnama (official search record), the defendant was not found in direct possession during the raid, and the investigation lacked independent witnesses and FSL (forensic) reports to definitively establish the defendant's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C.NO. 41/2026 Court Decision: The Principal J.M.F.C, Umrala acquitted defendant Rajubhai Bajubhai Vaghela of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) for alleged illicit liquor possession and sale, finding insufficient evidence of exclusive conscious possession to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite seizure of contraband material, prosecution witnesses (panchas/village elders) failed to corroborate critical details of the seizure panchnama (official search record), the defendant was not found in direct possession during the raid, and the investigation lacked independent witnesses and FSL (forensic) reports to definitively establish the defendant's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts