THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAJUBHAI BAJUBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - B P PARMAR — 41/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN090000492026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

19-01-2026

Filing Number

41/2026

Filing Date

19-01-2026

Registration No

41/2026

Registration Date

19-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UMRALA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

13th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198059250548

Police Station

UMRALA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAJUBHAI BAJUBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - B P PARMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

13-05-2026

Disposed

11-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

05-05-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

18-04-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

10-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

13-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: C.C.NO. 41/2026 Court Decision: The Principal J.M.F.C, Umrala acquitted defendant Rajubhai Bajubhai Vaghela of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) for alleged illicit liquor possession and sale, finding insufficient evidence of exclusive conscious possession to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite seizure of contraband material, prosecution witnesses (panchas/village elders) failed to corroborate critical details of the seizure panchnama (official search record), the defendant was not found in direct possession during the raid, and the investigation lacked independent witnesses and FSL (forensic) reports to definitively establish the defendant's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C.NO. 41/2026 Court Decision: The Principal J.M.F.C, Umrala acquitted defendant Rajubhai Bajubhai Vaghela of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) for alleged illicit liquor possession and sale, finding insufficient evidence of exclusive conscious possession to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite seizure of contraband material, prosecution witnesses (panchas/village elders) failed to corroborate critical details of the seizure panchnama (official search record), the defendant was not found in direct possession during the raid, and the investigation lacked independent witnesses and FSL (forensic) reports to definitively establish the defendant's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, UMRALA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case