THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs NANJIBHAI VALLABHBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - R M RATHOD, R B ZALA — 19/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 308(2),351(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN090000262026
e-Filing Number
03-01-2026
Filing Number
19/2026
Filing Date
12-Jan-2026
Registration No
19/2026
Registration Date
12-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, UMRALA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198059250503
Police Station
UMRALA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.NANJIBHAI VALLABHBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - R M RATHOD, R B ZALA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Judegement
Summary of Criminal Case No. 19/2026 The court acquitted the accused Nanjibhai Vallabhbhai Solanki of charges under IPC Sections 308(2), 351(3) and Gujarat Finance Act Sections 40, 42. The complainant alleged the accused had threatened violence to recover a loan of Rs. 2 lakhs with 2% interest given four years prior, but the court found the complainant's witnesses provided contradictory and unreliable testimony that failed to prove the criminal charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2026
Copies To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 19/2026
Summary of Criminal Case No. 19/2026 The court acquitted the accused Nanjibhai Vallabhbhai Solanki of charges under IPC Sections 308(2), 351(3) and Gujarat Finance Act Sections 40, 42. The complainant alleged the accused had threatened violence to recover a loan of Rs. 2 lakhs with 2% interest given four years prior, but the court found the complainant's witnesses provided contradictory and unreliable testimony that failed to prove the criminal charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts