PGVCL SIHOR RURAL SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs LEGAL HAIR BACHUBHAI BHIMABHAI NA VARSO MAKABHAI BACHUBHAI — 394/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th March 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080029052025
Filing Number
394/2025
Filing Date
10-12-2025
Registration No
394/2025
Registration Date
10-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL SIHOR RURAL SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
LEGAL HAIR BACHUBHAI BHIMABHAI NA VARSO MAKABHAI BACHUBHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS OF EXECUTION
PROCESS OF EXECUTION
PROCESS OF EXECUTION
PROCESS OF EXECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-02-2026 | PROCESS OF EXECUTION |
| 05-02-2026 | PROCESS OF EXECUTION |
| 15-01-2026 | PROCESS OF EXECUTION |
| 02-01-2026 | PROCESS OF EXECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the petitioner's request for additional time to complete execution proceedings against the respondent, finding that the debtor has not cooperated with the process and refuses to appear before the court. The court held that granting further extension would be unjustified and ruled that the execution petition should proceed without further delay, emphasizing that the debtor's non-cooperation and absence constitute grounds for continuing with execution proceedings as per established procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the petitioner's request for additional time to complete execution proceedings against the respondent, finding that the debtor has not cooperated with the process and refuses to appear before the court. The court held that granting further extension would be unjustified and ruled that the execution petition should proceed without further delay, emphasizing that the debtor's non-cooperation and absence constitute grounds for continuing with execution proceedings as per established procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts