PGVCL SIHOR RURAL SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs LEGAL HAIR BACHUBHAI BHIMABHAI NA VARSO MAKABHAI BACHUBHAI — 394/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJBN080029052025

Filing Number

394/2025

Filing Date

10-Dec-2025

Registration No

394/2025

Registration Date

10-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SIHOR

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PGVCL SIHOR RURAL SUB DIVISION SIHOR

    Adv. P B HARMANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LEGAL HAIR BACHUBHAI BHIMABHAI NA VARSO MAKABHAI BACHUBHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the petitioner's request for additional time to complete execution proceedings against the respondent, finding that the debtor has not cooperated with the process and refuses to appear before the court. The court held that granting further extension would be unjustified and ruled that the execution petition should proceed without further delay, emphasizing that the debtor's non-cooperation and absence constitute grounds for continuing with execution proceedings as per established procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Process Of Execution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Process Of Execution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 15-Jan-2026

    Process Of Execution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Process Of Execution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 10-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 394/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the petitioner's request for additional time to complete execution proceedings against the respondent, finding that the debtor has not cooperated with the process and refuses to appear before the court. The court held that granting further extension would be unjustified and ruled that the execution petition should proceed without further delay, emphasizing that the debtor's non-cooperation and absence constitute grounds for continuing with execution proceedings as per established procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case