PGVCL SIHOR RURAL SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs SURABHAI BHURABHAI KUVADIYA — 393/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080029042025
Filing Number
393/2025
Filing Date
10-Dec-2025
Registration No
393/2025
Registration Date
10-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL SIHOR RURAL SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SURABHAI BHURABHAI KUVADIYA
-
2.AJUBHAI BHURABHAI KUVADIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sihor Rural Sub Division against respondents Surabhai and Ajubhai Kuvadiya due to the defendants' non-appearance and failure to cooperate in proceeding, citing their contumacious conduct. The court ruled that dismissal for default was justified and reasonable given the defendants' repeated absence despite notices and adequate opportunities to participate in the execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Feb-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Feb-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Jan-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Jan-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 393/2025
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sihor Rural Sub Division against respondents Surabhai and Ajubhai Kuvadiya due to the defendants' non-appearance and failure to cooperate in proceeding, citing their contumacious conduct. The court ruled that dismissal for default was justified and reasonable given the defendants' repeated absence despite notices and adequate opportunities to participate in the execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts