BHAVNABEN W/O NITESHBHAI ZANZMERA D/O JANAKBHAI SHAMJIBHAI VORA vs NITESHBHAI DHIRUBHAI ZANZMERA — 54/2025
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 18th April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBN080006472025
Filing Number
54/2025
Filing Date
19-03-2025
Registration No
54/2025
Registration Date
19-03-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHAVNABEN W/O NITESHBHAI ZANZMERA D/O JANAKBHAI SHAMJIBHAI VORA
Adv. F H PADHIYAR
MINOR HETAVI NITESHBHAI ZANZMERA
MINOR SUHANI NITESHBHAI ZANZMERA
MINOR PARIDHI NITESHBHAI ZANZMERA
MINOR DHRUVI NITESHBHAI ZANZMERA
MINOR KEVIN NITESHBHAI ZANZMERA
Respondent(s)
NITESHBHAI DHIRUBHAI ZANZMERA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 31-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 03-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA No. 54/2025 The court dismissed the petition filed by Bhavnaben and minors Hetavi and Suhani Zanzmera against Niteshbhai Dhirubhai Zanzmera for default due to the petitioners' lack of diligence. Despite repeated opportunities and adjournments, the petitioners failed to present evidence or appear through counsel, making it impossible to proceed with the case. No separate costs order was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA No. 54/2025 The court dismissed the petition filed by Bhavnaben and minors Hetavi and Suhani Zanzmera against Niteshbhai Dhirubhai Zanzmera for default due to the petitioners' lack of diligence. Despite repeated opportunities and adjournments, the petitioners failed to present evidence or appear through counsel, making it impossible to proceed with the case. No separate costs order was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts