KHIMJIBHAI BACHUBHAI DHANDHUKIYA vs PARSHOTAMBHAI BACHUBHAI DHANDHUKIYA — 23/2025
Case under Succession Act,indian 1925 Section 372. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th March 2026.
CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU
CNR: GJBN080002542025
Filing Number
23/2025
Filing Date
06-Feb-2025
Registration No
23/2025
Registration Date
06-Feb-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KHIMJIBHAI BACHUBHAI DHANDHUKIYA
Adv. R D JANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.PARSHOTAMBHAI BACHUBHAI DHANDHUKIYA
-
2.THAKARSHIBHAI BACHUBHAI DHANDHUKIYA
-
3.VINODBHAI ODHAVJIBHAI DHANDHUKIYA
-
4.HARSHADBHAI ODHAVJIBHAI DHANDHUKIYA
-
5.MAHENDRABHAI ODHAVJIBHAI DHANDHUKIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: CMA 23/2025 The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal for default under CPC 1908, Order 9, Rule 3, finding the petitioner failed to comply with court orders to deposit decreed amount and appear in court within the stipulated timeframe. The court ordered dismissal for default and directed the petitioner to bear the respondent's court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Sep-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Aug-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Jul-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-May-2025
Notice To Opponents
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 23/2025
Case Summary: CMA 23/2025 The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal for default under CPC 1908, Order 9, Rule 3, finding the petitioner failed to comply with court orders to deposit decreed amount and appear in court within the stipulated timeframe. The court ordered dismissal for default and directed the petitioner to bear the respondent's court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts