PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs VAGHABHAI RAJABHAI RABARI — 32/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 27th March 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080000662026
Filing Number
32/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
32/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
VAGHABHAI RAJABHAI RABARI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 19-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 05-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 13-01-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 32 OF 2026 The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against respondent Vaghabhai Rajabhai Rabari for default, as the petitioner failed to appear before the court or pursue the proceedings despite multiple opportunities. The court held that the petitioner's inaction and non-cooperation in advancing the case justified dismissal under principles of default, noting that creditors must actively participate in execution proceedings to comply with court orders for completion within the prescribed timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 32 OF 2026 The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against respondent Vaghabhai Rajabhai Rabari for default, as the petitioner failed to appear before the court or pursue the proceedings despite multiple opportunities. The court held that the petitioner's inaction and non-cooperation in advancing the case justified dismissal under principles of default, noting that creditors must actively participate in execution proceedings to comply with court orders for completion within the prescribed timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts