PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs ANILBHAI KANJIBHAI VAGHELA — 31/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080000652026
Filing Number
31/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
31/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
ANILBHAI KANJIBHAI VAGHELA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 19-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 05-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 13-01-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 31/2026 PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor v. Anilbhai Kanjibhai Vaghela The court dismissed the petition due to the respondent's non-cooperation and absence. Despite being given adequate time and notice to appear for warrant execution proceedings, the respondent failed to comply or demonstrate willingness to cooperate in advancing the case proceedings. The court found it unjustifiable to grant further extensions given the respondent's consistent default, ordering dismissal of the execution petition for default attributable to the respondent's negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 31/2026 PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor v. Anilbhai Kanjibhai Vaghela The court dismissed the petition due to the respondent's non-cooperation and absence. Despite being given adequate time and notice to appear for warrant execution proceedings, the respondent failed to comply or demonstrate willingness to cooperate in advancing the case proceedings. The court found it unjustifiable to grant further extensions given the respondent's consistent default, ordering dismissal of the execution petition for default attributable to the respondent's negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts