PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs RAMESHBHAI MOHANBHAI CHUDASAMA — 30/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJBN080000642026

Filing Number

30/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

30/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SIHOR

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR

    Adv. P B HARMANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHBHAI MOHANBHAI CHUDASAMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    In this execution case, the court dismissed the petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against Rameshbhai Mohanbhai Chudasama for failure to pursue the matter. The respondent had not submitted the required affidavit despite being given time, and despite the court's orders, failed to cooperate in advancing the case proceedings. The court ruled that dismissal for default was justified and appropriate under the circumstances, with no separate order regarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 30/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In this execution case, the court dismissed the petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against Rameshbhai Mohanbhai Chudasama for failure to pursue the matter. The respondent had not submitted the required affidavit despite being given time, and despite the court's orders, failed to cooperate in advancing the case proceedings. The court ruled that dismissal for default was justified and appropriate under the circumstances, with no separate order regarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case