PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs GOHIL RAGHUVIRSINH NAVALSINH — 28/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080000612026
Filing Number
28/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
28/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
GOHIL RAGHUVIRSINH NAVALSINH
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 19-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 05-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 13-01-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division against Gohil Raghuvirsinh Navalsinh due to the respondent's non-cooperation and repeated absence from court proceedings despite notices. The court found that since adequate time had already been provided and the respondent showed no willingness to comply with the warrant of attachment proceedings, dismissing the petition for default was justified and appropriate under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division against Gohil Raghuvirsinh Navalsinh due to the respondent's non-cooperation and repeated absence from court proceedings despite notices. The court found that since adequate time had already been provided and the respondent showed no willingness to comply with the warrant of attachment proceedings, dismissing the petition for default was justified and appropriate under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts