PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs DULABHAI SONDABHAI VAGHELA — 27/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJBN080000602026

Filing Number

27/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

27/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SIHOR

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR

    Adv. P B HARMANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DULABHAI SONDABHAI VAGHELA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against respondent Dulabhai Sondabhai Vaghela, finding that the respondent's repeated non-appearance and failure to cooperate in proceedings despite being summoned rendered further continuation unjustifiable. The court held that dismissing the case for default due to the respondent's default was appropriate and reasonable under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 27/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against respondent Dulabhai Sondabhai Vaghela, finding that the respondent's repeated non-appearance and failure to cooperate in proceedings despite being summoned rendered further continuation unjustifiable. The court held that dismissing the case for default due to the respondent's default was appropriate and reasonable under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case