PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs GUJ. KAMABHAI KALABHAI NA VARAS RANCHHODBHAI KAMABHAI — 26/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJBN080000592026

Case disposed

Filing Number

26/2026

Filing Date

13-01-2026

Registration No

26/2026

Registration Date

13-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SIHOR

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 51,34

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR

Adv. P B HARMANI

Respondent(s)

GUJ. KAMABHAI KALABHAI NA VARAS RANCHHODBHAI KAMABHAI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

10-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR

19-02-2026

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR

05-02-2026

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR

13-01-2026

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 26/2026 Court Decision: The court dismissed the petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor for default (Dismiss for Default). The respondent failed to appear before the court despite being notified, and the petitioner did not make adequate efforts to prosecute the case, rendering it impossible to proceed further. Key Reasoning: The court found that the respondent's continued absence and non-cooperation prevented the case from advancing. Although the respondent was given sufficient time and repeated notices to appear, he neither complied nor demonstrated genuine intent to participate in proceedings. The petitioner's lack of effort to pursue the matter actively further justified dismissal under established legal principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 26/2026 Court Decision: The court dismissed the petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor for default (Dismiss for Default). The respondent failed to appear before the court despite being notified, and the petitioner did not make adequate efforts to prosecute the case, rendering it impossible to proceed further. Key Reasoning: The court found that the respondent's continued absence and non-cooperation prevented the case from advancing. Although the respondent was given sufficient time and repeated notices to appear, he neither complied nor demonstrated genuine intent to participate in proceedings. The petitioner's lack of effort to pursue the matter actively further justified dismissal under established legal principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SIHOR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case