PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs HIRJIBHAI PARSHOTTAMBHAI DABHI — 21/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080000542026
Filing Number
21/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
21/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
HIRJIBHAI PARSHOTTAMBHAI DABHI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 19-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 05-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 13-01-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 21/2026 The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against respondent Hirjibhai Parshottambhai Dabhi due to the respondent's consistent non-compliance and non-appearance despite multiple summons. The court found that the respondent, despite being given adequate time to comply with the court's orders and attend proceedings, deliberately failed to cooperate, making it unreasonable to grant further extensions. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for default attributable to the respondent's default, with no separate costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 21/2026 The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against respondent Hirjibhai Parshottambhai Dabhi due to the respondent's consistent non-compliance and non-appearance despite multiple summons. The court found that the respondent, despite being given adequate time to comply with the court's orders and attend proceedings, deliberately failed to cooperate, making it unreasonable to grant further extensions. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for default attributable to the respondent's default, with no separate costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts