PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs SHARDABEN DHIRUBHAI RATHOD — 20/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080000532026
Filing Number
20/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
20/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
SHARDABEN DHIRUBHAI RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 19-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 05-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 13-01-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 20 OF 2026 The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against Shardaben Dhirubhai Rathod for default, citing the respondent's non-cooperation and failure to appear despite being given adequate time and opportunity to comply with court proceedings. The court found that granting further extension was neither justified nor reasonable given the respondent's consistent absence and lack of effort to participate in the proceedings, and ordered dismissal of the execution petition for default due to the respondent's default in appearing before court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 20 OF 2026 The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against Shardaben Dhirubhai Rathod for default, citing the respondent's non-cooperation and failure to appear despite being given adequate time and opportunity to comply with court proceedings. The court found that granting further extension was neither justified nor reasonable given the respondent's consistent absence and lack of effort to participate in the proceedings, and ordered dismissal of the execution petition for default due to the respondent's default in appearing before court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts