PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs MATHURBHAI SAVJIBHAI KOLI — 19/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080000522026
Filing Number
19/2026
Filing Date
13-Jan-2026
Registration No
19/2026
Registration Date
13-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MATHURBHAI SAVJIBHAI KOLI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 19 OF 2026 The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against Mathurbhai Savjibhai Koli for default. The court found that the respondent failed to appear before the court despite being notified and given adequate time to comply, and made no effort to cooperate in executing the warrant. The court deemed it unjustified to grant further extensions given the respondent's consistent non-appearance and non-compliance, and ordered the petition dismissed as default due to the respondent's negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Feb-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Feb-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 19/2026
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 19 OF 2026 The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against Mathurbhai Savjibhai Koli for default. The court found that the respondent failed to appear before the court despite being notified and given adequate time to comply, and made no effort to cooperate in executing the warrant. The court deemed it unjustified to grant further extensions given the respondent's consistent non-appearance and non-compliance, and ordered the petition dismissed as default due to the respondent's negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts