PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs MATHURBHAI SAVJIBHAI KOLI — 19/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080000522026
Filing Number
19/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
19/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
MATHURBHAI SAVJIBHAI KOLI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 19-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 05-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 13-01-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 19 OF 2026 The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against Mathurbhai Savjibhai Koli for default. The court found that the respondent failed to appear before the court despite being notified and given adequate time to comply, and made no effort to cooperate in executing the warrant. The court deemed it unjustified to grant further extensions given the respondent's consistent non-appearance and non-compliance, and ordered the petition dismissed as default due to the respondent's negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 19 OF 2026 The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against Mathurbhai Savjibhai Koli for default. The court found that the respondent failed to appear before the court despite being notified and given adequate time to comply, and made no effort to cooperate in executing the warrant. The court deemed it unjustified to grant further extensions given the respondent's consistent non-appearance and non-compliance, and ordered the petition dismissed as default due to the respondent's negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts