PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs JAYANYBHAI ARJANBHAI PARMAR — 18/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080000512026
Filing Number
18/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
18/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
JAYANYBHAI ARJANBHAI PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 19-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 05-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 13-01-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 18/2026 PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor v. Jayanybhai Arjanbhai Parmar The court dismissed the petition for default against the respondent due to non-compliance with procedural requirements. Although the respondent was given notice and directed to appear for warrant execution proceedings, he failed to present himself in court despite being afforded adequate opportunity. The court held that dismissing the case for default was justified given the respondent's consistent non-appearance and lack of cooperation in advancing the matter, and directed that the respondent must appear before the court without further delay to comply with the Supreme Court's directive within six months, failing which the case would be dismissed as the respondent's default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 18/2026 PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor v. Jayanybhai Arjanbhai Parmar The court dismissed the petition for default against the respondent due to non-compliance with procedural requirements. Although the respondent was given notice and directed to appear for warrant execution proceedings, he failed to present himself in court despite being afforded adequate opportunity. The court held that dismissing the case for default was justified given the respondent's consistent non-appearance and lack of cooperation in advancing the matter, and directed that the respondent must appear before the court without further delay to comply with the Supreme Court's directive within six months, failing which the case would be dismissed as the respondent's default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts