PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs BHUPATBHAI VALABHAI LELA — 17/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080000502026
Filing Number
17/2026
Filing Date
13-Jan-2026
Registration No
17/2026
Registration Date
13-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHUPATBHAI VALABHAI LELA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against respondent Bhupatbhai Valabhai Lela for default, citing the petitioner's repeated non-appearance and lack of cooperation in court proceedings. The court found that despite adequate opportunities and notices to appear for warrant execution, the petitioner failed to demonstrate commitment to pursuing the case, making it unjustifiable to grant further time extensions. Accordingly, the execution case was dismissed for the petitioner's default and lack of diligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Feb-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Feb-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 17/2026
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against respondent Bhupatbhai Valabhai Lela for default, citing the petitioner's repeated non-appearance and lack of cooperation in court proceedings. The court found that despite adequate opportunities and notices to appear for warrant execution, the petitioner failed to demonstrate commitment to pursuing the case, making it unjustifiable to grant further time extensions. Accordingly, the execution case was dismissed for the petitioner's default and lack of diligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts