PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs DAYABHAI ARJANBHAI — 15/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 27th March 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080000482026
Filing Number
15/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
15/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
DAYABHAI ARJANBHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 19-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 05-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 13-01-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 15/2026 Summary: The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against Dayabhai Arjanbhai for default, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate adequate diligence in pursuing the case. Despite multiple court dates and opportunities to advance proceedings, the petitioner remained absent and took no substantive action, thereby losing its right to continue the execution. The court ordered dismissal of the petition due to the petitioner's default and lack of cooperation with court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 15/2026 Summary: The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against Dayabhai Arjanbhai for default, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate adequate diligence in pursuing the case. Despite multiple court dates and opportunities to advance proceedings, the petitioner remained absent and took no substantive action, thereby losing its right to continue the execution. The court ordered dismissal of the petition due to the petitioner's default and lack of cooperation with court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts