PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs JAYUBHAI BHIKHABHAI GOHIL — 14/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080000472026
Filing Number
14/2026
Filing Date
13-Jan-2026
Registration No
14/2026
Registration Date
13-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAYUBHAI BHIKHABHAI GOHIL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 14/2026 The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against respondent Jayubhai Bhikhabhai Gohil for default. The court found that the respondent failed to appear before the court despite being served notice for warrant execution proceedings, and his continued non-cooperation prevented progress of the case. The court held that dismissing the petition for default due to the respondent's non-compliance was justified and reasonable, as he had been given adequate opportunity to appear and cooperate but failed to do so. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Feb-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Feb-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 14/2026
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 14/2026 The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against respondent Jayubhai Bhikhabhai Gohil for default. The court found that the respondent failed to appear before the court despite being served notice for warrant execution proceedings, and his continued non-cooperation prevented progress of the case. The court held that dismissing the petition for default due to the respondent's non-compliance was justified and reasonable, as he had been given adequate opportunity to appear and cooperate but failed to do so. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts