PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs JAYUBHAI BHIKHABHAI GOHIL — 14/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080000472026
Filing Number
14/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
14/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
JAYUBHAI BHIKHABHAI GOHIL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 19-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 05-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 13-01-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 14/2026 The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against respondent Jayubhai Bhikhabhai Gohil for default. The court found that the respondent failed to appear before the court despite being served notice for warrant execution proceedings, and his continued non-cooperation prevented progress of the case. The court held that dismissing the petition for default due to the respondent's non-compliance was justified and reasonable, as he had been given adequate opportunity to appear and cooperate but failed to do so. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 14/2026 The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against respondent Jayubhai Bhikhabhai Gohil for default. The court found that the respondent failed to appear before the court despite being served notice for warrant execution proceedings, and his continued non-cooperation prevented progress of the case. The court held that dismissing the petition for default due to the respondent's non-compliance was justified and reasonable, as he had been given adequate opportunity to appear and cooperate but failed to do so. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts