PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs GUJ.SIDIBHAI PUNABHAI NA VARAS ANUBHAI SIDIBHAI — 11/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080000442026
Filing Number
11/2026
Filing Date
13-Jan-2026
Registration No
11/2026
Registration Date
13-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.GUJ.SIDIBHAI PUNABHAI NA VARAS ANUBHAI SIDIBHAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor as dismissed for default (D.M.I.S. for default) against the respondent due to the respondent's non-appearance and failure to cooperate despite being properly notified. The court found that since the respondent failed to appear in court and did not comply with the court's directions to execute the judgment, it was justified and reasonable to dismiss the petition, particularly noting the respondent's repeated absence and lack of cooperation in proceeding with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Feb-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Feb-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 11/2026
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor as dismissed for default (D.M.I.S. for default) against the respondent due to the respondent's non-appearance and failure to cooperate despite being properly notified. The court found that since the respondent failed to appear in court and did not comply with the court's directions to execute the judgment, it was justified and reasonable to dismiss the petition, particularly noting the respondent's repeated absence and lack of cooperation in proceeding with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts