PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs GUJ.SIDIBHAI PUNABHAI NA VARAS ANUBHAI SIDIBHAI — 11/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080000442026
Filing Number
11/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
11/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
GUJ.SIDIBHAI PUNABHAI NA VARAS ANUBHAI SIDIBHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 19-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 05-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 13-01-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor as dismissed for default (D.M.I.S. for default) against the respondent due to the respondent's non-appearance and failure to cooperate despite being properly notified. The court found that since the respondent failed to appear in court and did not comply with the court's directions to execute the judgment, it was justified and reasonable to dismiss the petition, particularly noting the respondent's repeated absence and lack of cooperation in proceeding with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor as dismissed for default (D.M.I.S. for default) against the respondent due to the respondent's non-appearance and failure to cooperate despite being properly notified. The court found that since the respondent failed to appear in court and did not comply with the court's directions to execute the judgment, it was justified and reasonable to dismiss the petition, particularly noting the respondent's repeated absence and lack of cooperation in proceeding with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts