PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs RAMJIBHAI HARIBHAI VAGHASIYA — 8/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJBN080000412026

Case disposed

Filing Number

8/2026

Filing Date

13-01-2026

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

13-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SIHOR

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 51,34

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR

Adv. P B HARMANI

Respondent(s)

RAMJIBHAI HARIBHAI VAGHASIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

10-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT

19-02-2026

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR

05-02-2026

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR

13-01-2026

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 08 OF 2026 PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor v. Ramjibhai Haribhai Vaghasiya The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL (Petitioner) against Ramjibhai Haribhai Vaghasiya (Respondent) for default, citing the respondent's consistent non-cooperation and non-appearance despite proper notice. The court found that the respondent failed to comply with court directions and repeated summons for warrant execution proceedings, making further progress impossible. The court ordered dismissal due to the respondent's default and non-appearance, noting that extending time would be unjustified given the willful non-compliance with judicial directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 08 OF 2026 PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor v. Ramjibhai Haribhai Vaghasiya The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL (Petitioner) against Ramjibhai Haribhai Vaghasiya (Respondent) for default, citing the respondent's consistent non-cooperation and non-appearance despite proper notice. The court found that the respondent failed to comply with court directions and repeated summons for warrant execution proceedings, making further progress impossible. The court ordered dismissal due to the respondent's default and non-appearance, noting that extending time would be unjustified given the willful non-compliance with judicial directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SIHOR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case