PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs ZAVERBHAI KESHAVBHAI — 7/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080000392026
Filing Number
7/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
7/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
ZAVERBHAI KESHAVBHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 19-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 05-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 13-01-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 07/2026 The court dismissed the case against Zaverbhai Keshavbhai for non-compliance and default by the petitioner (PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor). The respondent failed to appear before the court despite being given adequate notice and opportunity to participate in proceedings, and the petitioner did not make genuine efforts to advance the case. The court ordered dismissal "for default" due to the respondent's consistent non-appearance and lack of cooperation in moving the matter forward. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 07/2026 The court dismissed the case against Zaverbhai Keshavbhai for non-compliance and default by the petitioner (PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor). The respondent failed to appear before the court despite being given adequate notice and opportunity to participate in proceedings, and the petitioner did not make genuine efforts to advance the case. The court ordered dismissal "for default" due to the respondent's consistent non-appearance and lack of cooperation in moving the matter forward. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts