PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs SHAMJIBHAI LAKHABHAI PARMAR — 6/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 27th March 2026.

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJBN080000382026

Case disposed

Filing Number

6/2026

Filing Date

13-01-2026

Registration No

6/2026

Registration Date

13-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SIHOR

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 51,34

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR

Adv. P B HARMANI

Respondent(s)

SHAMJIBHAI LAKHABHAI PARMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

27-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR

19-02-2026

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR

05-02-2026

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR

13-01-2026

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 06/2026 The court dismissed the execution case against respondent Shamjibhai Lakhabhai Parmar due to the petitioner PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor's failure to pursue the matter diligently. The petitioner did not appear in court or take any action to advance the case proceedings, demonstrating lack of intent to proceed with execution. Accordingly, the court ordered dismissal of the execution petition for default (Dismiss for Default) against the petitioner's default, while reserving the respondent's right to pursue a separate writ petition for attachment of immovable property if deemed necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 06/2026 The court dismissed the execution case against respondent Shamjibhai Lakhabhai Parmar due to the petitioner PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor's failure to pursue the matter diligently. The petitioner did not appear in court or take any action to advance the case proceedings, demonstrating lack of intent to proceed with execution. Accordingly, the court ordered dismissal of the execution petition for default (Dismiss for Default) against the petitioner's default, while reserving the respondent's right to pursue a separate writ petition for attachment of immovable property if deemed necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SIHOR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case