PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs SHAMJIBHAI LAKHABHAI PARMAR — 6/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 27th March 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080000382026
Filing Number
6/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
SHAMJIBHAI LAKHABHAI PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 19-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 05-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 13-01-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 06/2026 The court dismissed the execution case against respondent Shamjibhai Lakhabhai Parmar due to the petitioner PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor's failure to pursue the matter diligently. The petitioner did not appear in court or take any action to advance the case proceedings, demonstrating lack of intent to proceed with execution. Accordingly, the court ordered dismissal of the execution petition for default (Dismiss for Default) against the petitioner's default, while reserving the respondent's right to pursue a separate writ petition for attachment of immovable property if deemed necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 06/2026 The court dismissed the execution case against respondent Shamjibhai Lakhabhai Parmar due to the petitioner PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor's failure to pursue the matter diligently. The petitioner did not appear in court or take any action to advance the case proceedings, demonstrating lack of intent to proceed with execution. Accordingly, the court ordered dismissal of the execution petition for default (Dismiss for Default) against the petitioner's default, while reserving the respondent's right to pursue a separate writ petition for attachment of immovable property if deemed necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts