PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs GUJ. LABHUBHAI DAYALBHAI NA VARAS BHARATBHAI LABHUBHAI — 3/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080000342026
Filing Number
3/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
GUJ. LABHUBHAI DAYALBHAI NA VARAS BHARATBHAI LABHUBHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 19-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 05-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 13-01-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 03 OF 2026 The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against respondent Labhubhai Dayalbhai. The court found that despite being served notice to appear for warrant execution proceedings, the respondent remained absent and failed to cooperate with case proceedings. The court held that extending further time to the respondent was unjustified given his deliberate non-compliance and lack of effort to participate in the mandatory proceedings. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as defaulted due to the respondent's default, in accordance with established legal principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 03 OF 2026 The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against respondent Labhubhai Dayalbhai. The court found that despite being served notice to appear for warrant execution proceedings, the respondent remained absent and failed to cooperate with case proceedings. The court held that extending further time to the respondent was unjustified given his deliberate non-compliance and lack of effort to participate in the mandatory proceedings. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as defaulted due to the respondent's default, in accordance with established legal principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts