PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR vs SHARDABEN BAHADURBHAI RATHOD — 2/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBN080000332026
Filing Number
2/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
2/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHOR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL SANOSARA SUB DIVISION SIHOR
Adv. P B HARMANI
Respondent(s)
SHARDABEN BAHADURBHAI RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 19-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 05-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 13-01-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 02 OF 2026 The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against Shardaben Bahadurbhai Rathod for default, finding that the respondent's non-appearance was deliberate and unjustified despite repeated notices and sufficient time granted to comply. The court held that dismissing the case due to the respondent's contumacy was justified and reasonable, as further extensions would be neither warranted nor equitable given the lack of cooperation in advancing the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R. EXE. NO. 02 OF 2026 The court dismissed the execution petition filed by PGVCL Sanosara Sub Division Sihor against Shardaben Bahadurbhai Rathod for default, finding that the respondent's non-appearance was deliberate and unjustified despite repeated notices and sufficient time granted to comply. The court held that dismissing the case due to the respondent's contumacy was justified and reasonable, as further extensions would be neither warranted nor equitable given the lack of cooperation in advancing the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts